There are a couple of reasons why some individuals have a
hard time differentiating between structural engineers and architects. For one,
when you look at the job description for each, they can sound a bit similar and
for two, you can often see them working side by side on a variety of projects. But
alas, there is a thing or two that
separates us from our friends in the architecture business.
The best way to separate the two is to remember that it is an
architect’s job to focus more on what the structure will eventually look like
once the project is complete. Everyone has heard of an interior decorator and
all that that entails, so it shouldn’t be hard to understand why an architect
can be considered the exterior
decorator. They have their hand in all areas of what everything should look
like, where things go and exactly what purpose they will serve in the long run.
On the other hand, the structural engineer is more
responsible for the skeleton of the structure. All aspects of what goes into
making that piece a solid, well supported structure weighs heavily on the
skills and calculations of the engineer. It’s extremely important for the
structural engineer to deliver a final product that not only ensures that the project
will be effective in the long run, but that can also be considered safe for the
general public.
All in all, though structural engineers and architects both
work towards making the final product live up to all expectations, each has
their own area of focus. At the end of the day however, whether the structure
stand the test of time relies heavily on the work of the structural engineer.
No comments:
Post a Comment